Government contracts in Ingersoll
Federal contracts to vendors whose postal code places them in Ingersoll.
- Total value
- $129M
- Contracts
- 31
- Median contract
- $506K
- Non-competitive
- 61%
- of 18 contracts that say how they were awarded
Federal contracts over $10,000, contracts dated Jan 2004 to Sep 2026, each counted once at its latest reported value. Source: Treasury Board proactive publication of contracts, published October 13, 2026. Placed by the vendor’s postal code, which fewer than half of contracts give: totals here understate what vendors in this place got.
Top vendors
The vendors with the most contract value here.
| Vendor | Contracts | Total |
|---|---|---|
| IMT Partnership | 19 | $129M |
| Pow Peterman, Consulting Engineers | 4 | $481K |
| Commissionaires | 2 | $213K |
| Ppa Engineering Technologies Inc | 4 | $124K |
| Minitube Canada Ltd | 1 | $71K |
Plus 1 contracts ($15K) to individuals, sole proprietors and vendors this site does not name. They count in every total above. Why
Buyers
The departments and agencies that bought.
| Department or agency | Contracts | Total |
|---|---|---|
| National Defence | 18 | $128M |
| Parks Canada | 6 | $694K |
| National Research Council Canada | 1 | $506K |
| Environment and Climate Change Canada | 4 | $124K |
| Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada | 1 | $71K |
| Employment and Social Development Canada | 1 | $15K |
What was bought
By the Treasury Board object code each contract was filed under.
| Category | Contracts | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Ammunition | 4 | $72.4M |
| Engineering consultants-Other | 5 | $4.1M |
| Scientific services | 1 | $506K |
| Other equipment and Parts | 1 | $460K |
| Protection services | 2 | $213K |
| Engineering consultants-Construction | 3 | $101K |
| Bridges, Trestles, Culverts, Overpasses and Viaducts | 1 | $96K |
| Measuring, controlling, laboratory, medical and optical equipment and parts | 1 | $71K |
| Management consulting | 1 | $15K |
| Ferrous metals | 1 | $10K |
Largest contracts
Latest contracts
By year
Contracts by the year they were dated.
| Year | Contracts | Total |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 1 | $2.4M |
| 2009 | 1 | $3.7M |
| 2010 | 1 | $2.7M |
| 2011 | 1 | $4.4M |
| 2012 | 2 | $4.7M |
| 2013 | 1 | $6.3M |
| 2014 | 2 | $6.1M |
| 2015 | 2 | $12.8M |
| 2016 | 2 | $8.5M |
| 2017 | 3 | $492K |
| 2019 | 1 | $506K |
| 2022 | 2 | $216K |
| 2023 | 7 | $38M |
| 2024 | 1 | $11.7M |
| 2025 | 3 | $16M |
| 2026 | 1 | $10.9M |
How they were awarded
As the department reported it; older contracts often don't say.
| Procurement method | Contracts | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Non-competitive | 11 | $76.7M |
| Not stated | 13 | $51.6M |
| Competitive: open bidding | 5 | $800K |
| Competitive | 2 | $312K |
Goods, services or construction
| Type | Contracts | Total |
|---|---|---|
| Services | 12 | $55.1M |
| Not stated | 13 | $51.6M |
| Goods | 4 | $22.7M |
| Construction | 2 | $79K |